4.2 Article

Assessment of time management skills: psychometric properties of the Swedish version

Journal

SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF OCCUPATIONAL THERAPY
Volume 25, Issue 3, Pages 153-161

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/11038128.2017.1375009

Keywords

Psychometrics; executive function; rehabilitation; reproducibility of results; mental disorders

Categories

Funding

  1. Centre for Clinical research in Dalarna [CKFUU-312401, CKFUU-37254]
  2. Orebro university [1.3.2-2134/2014]
  3. Faculty Board of Medicine and Health at Orebro university [1.3.1-01838/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Persons with impaired time management skills are often in need of occupational therapy. Valid and reliable instruments to assess time management and organizational skills are needed for the evaluation of intervention. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the psychometric properties of a Swedish version of the Assessment of Time Management Skills (ATMS-S) for persons with and without impaired time management skills. Method: A total of 238 persons participated in the study, of whom 94 had self-reported impaired time management skills due to mental disorders such as schizophrenic spectrum or neurodevelopmental disorders such as attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autism spectrum disorder (ASD) and mild intellectual disabilities, and 144 persons had no reported impaired time management skills. Rasch analysis was used to analyze data. Results: Three subscales were detected: the time management subscale with 11 items, the organization & planning subscale with 11 items, and the subscale of regulation of emotions with 5 items, with excellent to acceptable psychometric properties. The conclusions were that: ATMS-S is a valid instrument for self-rating of time management, organization & planning and for the regulation of emotions. ATMS-S can be useful for persons with mental disorders including mild neurodevelopmental disorders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available