4.8 Article

Novel Speciation Method Based on Diffusive Gradients in Thin-Films for in Situ Measurement of CrVI in Aquatic Systems

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY
Volume 49, Issue 24, Pages 14267-14273

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.est.5b03742

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21477053]
  2. program for Postgraduates Research and Innovation in Jiangsu Province [SJZZ_0014]
  3. Nanjing University
  4. Natural Environment Research Council [ceh010010] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Hexavalent chromium (Cr-VI) is much more toxic and mobile than the trivalent species (Cr-III) and consequently, in situ monitoring of Cr-VI can improve the understanding of Cr biogeochemistry and toxicity in ecosystems. The passive diffusive gradients in thin-films (DGT) technique is a powerful tool for determining metal(loid) speciation, but a binding phase that absorbs only one specific species of Cr is needed. N-Methyl-D-glucamine (NMDG) functional resin was incorporated into the DGT binding phase for selective measurement of Cr-VI. This NMDG-DGT sampler exhibited a theoretically linear accumulation of Cr-VI, with negligible accumulation (<5%) of Cr-III even after 72 h deployment. The good prediction of Cr-VI concentration in synthetic freshwater with NMDG-DGT, even in the presence of 10-time more Cr-III, further indicated the sampler's reliability in selective detection of Cr-VI. Moreover, its high capacity for Cr-VI, which exceeded 230 mu g cm(-2), facilitates measurement of Cr-VI in both uncontaminated natural waters and in slightly and heavily contaminated (ppm level) waters. Field deployment of the NMDG-DGT sampler in such waters allowed accurate measurement of time-averaged Cr-VI concentration, indicating its robustness for in situ measurements of Cr speciation and its potential for further application in the risk assessment of Cr.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available