4.7 Article

Liver Stiffness in Pediatric Patients with Fatty Liver Disease: Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility of Shear-Wave Elastography

Journal

RADIOLOGY
Volume 283, Issue 3, Pages 819-826

Publisher

RADIOLOGICAL SOC NORTH AMERICA
DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2016161002

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of shear-wave elastography (SWE) in identifying different degrees of fibrosis in a cohort of consecutive children and adolescents with nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Materials and Methods: Consecutive pediatric patients scheduled to undergo liver biopsy were studied with an ultrasonography-based SWE system. Elastography was performed in 68 of 69 patients with biopsy-proved NASH (37 boys and 31 girls; mean age, 12.6 years +/- 2.48; age range, 8-17 years). The correlations among laboratory findings, liver stiffness, and fibrosis score were analyzed, and the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the presence of any fibrosis (score >= F1) or significant fibrosis (score >= F2). Findings from histologic examination were used as the standard of reference. Results: SWE showed a very high correlation with liver fibrosis (P < .001) at univariate and multivariate analyses. The AUCs for the association of any and significant fibrosis were 0.92 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.86, 0.98) and 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95, 0.99), respectively. The intraclass correlation coefficient for absolute agreement was 0.95 (95% CI: 0.90, 0.97). Conclusion: SWE is an accurate and reproducible noninvasive technique that efficiently depicts the presence of significant liver fibrosis and, less accurately, mild liver fibrosis in pediatric patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Larger clinical prospective studies are warranted to confirm SWE accuracy and establish threshold values for fibrosis grading in comparison or in combination with other noninvasive methods. (C) RSNA, 2016

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available