4.6 Article

Haralick's texture features for the prediction of response to therapy in colorectal cancer: a preliminary study

Journal

RADIOLOGIA MEDICA
Volume 123, Issue 3, Pages 161-167

Publisher

SPRINGER-VERLAG ITALIA SRL
DOI: 10.1007/s11547-017-0833-8

Keywords

T2-weighted MRI; Colorectal cancer; Haralick's texture analysis; Response to therapy

Funding

  1. AIRC (Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro) Investigator Grant [2013/14129]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Haralick features Texture analysis is a recent oncologic imaging biomarker used to assess quantitatively the heterogeneity within a tumor. The aim of this study is to evaluate which Haralick's features are the most feasible in predicting tumor response to neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) in colorectal cancer. Materials and Methods After MRI and histological assessment, eight patients were enrolled and divided into two groups based on response to neoadjuvant CRT in complete responders (CR) and non-responders (NR). Oblique Axial T2-weighted MRI sequences before CRT were analyzed by two radiologists in consensus drawing a ROI around the tumor. 14 over 192 Haralick's features were extrapolated from normalized gray-level co-occurrence matrix in four different directions. A dedicated statistical analysis was performed to evaluate distribution of the extracted Haralick's features computing mean and standard deviation. Results Pretreatment MRI examination showed significant value (p < 0.05) of 5 over 14 computed Haralick texture. In particular, the significant features are the following: concerning energy, contrast, correlation, entropy and inverse difference moment. Conclusions Five Haralick's features showed significant relevance in the prediction of response to therapy in colorectal cancer and might be used as additional imaging biomarker in the oncologic management of colorectal patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available