Moving from significance to real-world meaning: methods for interpreting change in clinical outcome assessment scores

Interpreting change from patient reported outcome (PRO) endpoints: patient global ratings of concept versus patient global ratings of change, a case study among osteoporosis patients

(2016) Annabel Nixon et al.   Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Interpreting Change in Scores on Patient-Reported Outcome Instruments

(2015) Cheryl D. Coon et al.   Therapeutic Innovation & Regulatory Science

Don’t middle your MIDs: regression to the mean shrinks estimates of minimally important differences

(2013) Peter M. Fayers et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Methods for interpreting change over time in patient-reported outcome measures

(2012) K. W. Wyrwich et al.   QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH

Determining the non-inferiority margin for patient reported outcomes

(2011) Christoph Gerlinger et al.   PHARMACEUTICAL STATISTICS

Responder Analyses—A PhRMA Position Paper

(2011) Tom Uryniak et al.   Statistics in Biopharmaceutical Research

Defining a minimal clinically important difference for endometriosis-associated pelvic pain measured on a visual analog scale: analyses of two placebo-controlled, randomized trials

(2010) Christoph Gerlinger et al.   Health and Quality of Life Outcomes

Recommended methods for determining responsiveness and minimally important differences for patient-reported outcomes

(2007) Dennis Revicki et al.   JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY