Journal
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 11, Pages 1928-1940Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017000672
Keywords
Diet; Eating down; Pregnancy; Postpartum; Bangladesh
Funding
- Office of Health, Infectious Diseases, and Nutrition, Bureau for Global Health, US Agency for International Development (USAID) through the Food and Nutrition Technical Assistance III Project (FANTA) [AID-OAA-A-12-00005]
- National Institutes of Health (NIH) - Fogarty International Center [R25 TW009343]
- Office of Behavioral and Social Sciences Research
- Office of Research on Women's Health
- Office of AIDS Research
- National Institute of Mental Health
- National Institute on Drug Abuse
- University of California Global Health Institute
Ask authors/readers for more resources
ObjectiveTo: (i) determine the prevalence of self-reported eating less and eating down during early and late pregnancy and postpartum, and explore risk factors associated with eating less; (ii) examine the association between eating less and diet quality; and (iii) determine the association between eating less and weight gain during pregnancy.DesignData were collected longitudinally from a cohort of women participating in a community health programme. Diet was assessed at three time points (20 weeks' gestation, 36 weeks' gestation, 6 months' postpartum), body weight was measured during study enrolment (20 weeks' gestation) and at 36 weeks' gestation, and information about the woman and her household was collected at enrolment.SettingThe Rang-Din Nutrition Study in the Rangpur and Dinajpur districts of Bangladesh.SubjectsWomen (n 4011).ResultsThe prevalence of self-reported eating less differed by time point (759 % in early pregnancy, 388 % in late pregnancy, 74 % postpartum; P<0001). The most common reason for eating less across all time periods was food aversion or loss of appetite. Women who reported eating less in late pregnancy had consumed animal-source foods less frequently in the preceding week than women who reported eating more (mean (sd): 117 (74) v. 148 (92) times/week; P<0001) and had lower weekly weight gain than women who reported eating more (mean (se): 027 (0004) v. 033 (0004) kg/week; P<0001).ConclusionsEating less has negative implications with respect to diet quality and pregnancy weight gain in this context.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available