Journal
PUBLIC HEALTH NUTRITION
Volume 20, Issue 12, Pages 2260-2268Publisher
CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1368980017000878
Keywords
Orofacial clefts; Folic acid fortification; Meta-analysis
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Objective: Orofacial clefts (OFC) are the most prevalent craniofacial birth defect. Folic acid (FA) supplementation has been demonstrated as an effective intervention to reduce risk of OFC occurrence. However, the effect of mandatory FA fortification of wheat and/or maize flour on OFC prevalence has shown controversial results among countries adopting this policy. Thus, we performed a meta-analysis to synthesize the available evidence evaluating the global impact of this mandatory policy on OFC occurrence. Design: Literature search in conventional and grey medical/scientific databases showed fifteen studies considering OFC prevalence in pre- and post-fortification periods with FA. The effect of this policy was evaluated by computing relative risk (RR) and separating samples into total OFC, non-syndromic forms, cleft lip with or without cleft palate (CL/P) and cleft palate only (CPO). Results: We found a significant effect of FA fortification only on non-syndromic CL/P (RR = 0.88; 95% CI 0.81, 0.96), whereas neutral effects were detected for total OFC (syndromic plus non-syndromic) and CPO. Conclusions: Our results may reflect the different aetiology of syndromic OFC with respect to non-syndromic forms and the CL/P related to CPO. Although the number of non-syndromic CL/P samples was lower than that for total OFC, the absence of both between-study heterogeneity and publication bias leads us to conclude that FA fortification may have beneficial effects on non-syndromic CL/P.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available