Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density in the diagnostic algorithm of prostate cancer
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PROSTATE CANCER AND PROSTATIC DISEASES
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 57-63
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-12-19
DOI
10.1038/s41391-017-0024-7
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- EAU-ESTRO-SIOG Guidelines on Prostate Cancer. Part 1: Screening, Diagnosis, and Local Treatment with Curative Intent
- (2017) Nicolas Mottet et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- The Value of PSA Density in Combination with PI-RADS™ for the Accuracy of Prostate Cancer Prediction
- (2017) Florian A. Distler et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Diagnostic accuracy of multi-parametric MRI and TRUS biopsy in prostate cancer (PROMIS): a paired validating confirmatory study
- (2017) Hashim U Ahmed et al. LANCET
- Re-examining Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Density: Defining the Optimal PSA Range and Patients for Using PSA Density to Predict Prostate Cancer Using Extended Template Biopsy
- (2017) Joshua S. Jue et al. UROLOGY
- Prostate Cancer Early Detection, Version 1.2014
- (2017) Peter R. Carroll et al. Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network
- Prostate Health Index improves multivariable risk prediction of aggressive prostate cancer
- (2016) Stacy Loeb et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) risk calculators significantly outperform the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial (PCPT) 2.0 in the prediction of prostate cancer: a multi-institutional study
- (2016) Robert W. Foley et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Combination of prostate imaging reporting and data system (PI-RADS) score and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) density predicts biopsy outcome in prostate biopsy naïve patients
- (2016) Satoshi Washino et al. BJU INTERNATIONAL
- Comparison Between the Four-kallikrein Panel and Prostate Health Index for Predicting Prostate Cancer
- (2015) Tobias Nordström et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Predicting High-Grade Cancer at Ten-Core Prostate Biopsy Using Four Kallikrein Markers Measured in Blood in the ProtecT Study
- (2015) Richard J. Bryant et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Prostate cancer screening in men aged 50–69 years (STHLM3): a prospective population-based diagnostic study
- (2015) Henrik Grönberg et al. LANCET ONCOLOGY
- Predicting High-Grade Cancer at Ten-Core Prostate Biopsy Using Four Kallikrein Markers Measured in Blood in the ProtecT Study
- (2015) Richard J. Bryant et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Prostate Cancer Mortality in Areas With High and Low Prostate Cancer Incidence
- (2014) P. Stattin et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Screening and prostate cancer mortality: results of the European Randomised Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) at 13 years of follow-up
- (2014) Fritz H Schröder et al. LANCET
- Variability in MRI vs. ultrasound measures of prostate volume and its impact on treatment recommendations for favorable-risk prostate cancer patients: a case series
- (2014) Yonina R Murciano-Goroff et al. Radiation Oncology
- Infectious Complications and Hospital Admissions After Prostate Biopsy in a European Randomized Trial
- (2012) Stacy Loeb et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Prediction of Prostate Cancer Risk: The Role of Prostate Volume and Digital Rectal Examination in the ERSPC Risk Calculators
- (2011) Monique J. Roobol et al. EUROPEAN UROLOGY
- Complications After Prostate Biopsy: Data From SEER-Medicare
- (2011) Stacy Loeb et al. JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
- Estimating the benefits of PSA screening
- (2009) Andrew J. Vickers et al. Nature Reviews Urology
Discover Peeref hubs
Discuss science. Find collaborators. Network.
Join a conversationBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started