Oncological Outcomes After Radical Prostatectomy for High-Risk Prostate Cancer Based on New Gleason Grouping System: A Validation Study From University of Southern California With 3,755 Cases

Gleason Score 3 + 5 or 5 + 3 versus 4 + 4 Prostate Cancer: The Risk of Death

(2016) Mai Anh Huynh et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

A Contemporary Prostate Cancer Grading System: A Validated Alternative to the Gleason Score

(2016) Jonathan I. Epstein et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Stratification of High-risk Prostate Cancer into Prognostic Categories: A European Multi-institutional Study

(2015) Steven Joniau et al.   EUROPEAN UROLOGY

Patients with Biopsy Gleason 9 and 10 Prostate Cancer Have Significantly Worse Outcomes Compared to Patients with Gleason 8 Disease

(2015) Che-kai Tsao et al.   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY

Radical Prostatectomy or Watchful Waiting in Early Prostate Cancer

(2014) Anna Bill-Axelson et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Prognostic Gleason grade grouping: data based on the modified Gleason scoring system

(2013) Phillip M. Pierorazio et al.   BJU INTERNATIONAL

Long-Term Functional Outcomes after Treatment for Localized Prostate Cancer

(2013) Matthew J. Resnick et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Radical Prostatectomy versus Observation for Localized Prostate Cancer

(2012) Timothy J. Wilt et al.   NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE

Prostate Cancer With Tertiary Gleason Pattern 5 in Prostate Needle Biopsy

(2009) Kiril Trpkov et al.   AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGICAL PATHOLOGY

An Update of the Gleason Grading System

(2009) Jonathan I. Epstein   JOURNAL OF UROLOGY