4.7 Article

Network reorganization and breakdown of an ant - plant protection mutualism with elevation

Journal

Publisher

ROYAL SOC
DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2016.2564

Keywords

altitudinal gradients; biotic defence; global change; herbivory; myrmecophyte; network specialization

Funding

  1. Czech Science Foundation Center for tropical biology [13.10486S]
  2. Grant Agency of University of South Bohemia [156/2013/P]
  3. Darwin Initiative for the Survival of Species [19-008]
  4. Balfour-Browne trust fund of the Department of Zoology at the University of Cambridge

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Both the abiotic environment and the composition of animal and plant communities change with elevation. For mutualistic species, these changes are expected to result in altered partner availability, and shifts in context-dependent benefits for partners. To test these predictions, we assessed the network structure of terrestrial ant-plant mutualists and how the benefits to plants of ant inhabitation changed with elevation in tropical forest in Papua New Guinea. At higher elevations, ant-plants were rarer, species richness of both ants and plants decreased, and the average ant or plant species interacted with fewer partners. However, networks became increasingly connected and less specialized, more than could be accounted for by reductions in ant-plant abundance. On the most common ant-plant, ants recruited less and spent less time attacking a surrogate herbivore at higher elevations, and herbivory damage increased. These changes were driven by turnover of ant species rather than by within-species shifts in protective behaviour. We speculate that reduced partner availability at higher elevations results in less specialized networks, while lower temperatures mean that even for ant-inhabited plants, benefits are reduced. Under increased abiotic stress, mutualistic networks can break down, owing to a combination of lower population sizes, and a reduction in context-dependent mutualistic benefits.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available