4.8 Article

Increased nitrous oxide emissions from Arctic peatlands after permafrost thaw

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1702902114

Keywords

Arctic soils; nitrogen; greenhouse gases; climate change; tundra

Funding

  1. Nordic Center of Excellence DEFROST
  2. Academy of Finland project CryoN [132045]
  3. European Union FP7-ENV project [PAGE21, 282700]
  4. Joint Programming Initiative Climate project Constraining Uncertainties in the Permafrost-Climate Feedback (COUP) [291691]
  5. University of Eastern Finland's doctoral program in Environmental Physics, Health, and Biology
  6. European Cooperation in Science and Technology (COST) Action ABBA [ES0804]
  7. Academy of Finland (AKA) [132045] Funding Source: Academy of Finland (AKA)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Permafrost in the Arctic is thawing, exposing large carbon and nitrogen stocks for decomposition. Gaseous carbon release from Arctic soils due to permafrost thawing is known to be substantial, but growing evidence suggests that Arctic soils may also be relevant sources of nitrous oxide (N2O). Here we show that N2O emissions from subarctic peatlands increase as the permafrost thaws. In our study, the highest postthaw emissions occurred from bare peat surfaces, a typical landform in permafrost peatlands, where permafrost thaw caused a fivefold increase in emissions (0.56 +/- 0.11 vs. 2.81 +/- 0.6 mg N2O m(-2) d(-1)). These emission rates match those from tropical forest soils, the world's largest natural terrestrial N2O source. The presence of vegetation, known to limit N2O emissions in tundra, did decrease (by similar to 90%) but did not prevent thaw-induced N2O release, whereas waterlogged conditions suppressed the emissions. We show that regions with high probability for N2O emissions cover one-fourth of the Arctic. Our results imply that the Arctic N2O budget will depend strongly on moisture changes, and that a gradual deepening of the active layer will create a strong noncarbon climate change feedback.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available