4.8 Article

Control of metastatic niche formation by targeting APBA3/Mint3 in inflammatory monocytes

Publisher

NATL ACAD SCIENCES
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1703171114

Keywords

APBA3/Mint3; macrophage; metastasis

Funding

  1. Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
  2. MEXT
  3. Japan Agency for Medical Research and Development
  4. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16H04695, 17K08904] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cancer metastasis is intricately orchestrated by both cancer and normal cells, such as endothelial cells and macrophages. Monocytes/macrophages, which are often co-opted by cancer cells and promote tumor malignancy, acquire more than half of their energy from glycolysis even during normoxic conditions. This glycolytic activity is maintained during normoxia by the functions of hypoxia inducible factor 1 (HIF-1) and its activator APBA3. The mechanism by which APBA3 inhibition partially suppresses macrophage function and affects cancer metastasis is of interest in view of avoidance of the adverse effects of complete suppression of macrophage function during therapy. Here, we report that APBA3-deficient mice show reduced metastasis, with no apparent effect on primary tumor growth. APBA3 deficiency in inflammatory monocytes, which strongly express the chemokine receptor CCR2 and are recruited toward chemokine CCL2 from metastatic sites, hampers glycolysis-dependent chemotaxis of cells toward metastatic sites and inhibits VEGFA expression, similar to the effects observed with HIF-1 deficiency. Host APBA3 induces VEGFA-mediated E-selectin expression in the endothelial cells of target organs, thereby promoting extravasation of cancer cells and micrometastasis formation. Administration of E-selectin-neutralizing antibody also abolished host APBA3-mediated metastatic formation. Thus, targeting APBA3 is useful for controlling metastatic niche formation by inflammatory monocytes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available