4.7 Article

Measuring colour of vine tomatoes using hyperspectral imaging

Journal

POSTHARVEST BIOLOGY AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 129, Issue -, Pages 79-89

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.postharvbio.2017.03.006

Keywords

Hyperspectral imaging; CIE L*a*b*; Direct calculation; Chemometrics; Quality inspection; Ripeness; Colorimeter

Funding

  1. Institute for the Promotion of Innovation through Science and Technology (IWT-Vlaanderen) [121620]
  2. Industrial Research Fund at KU Leuven
  3. European Union's Seventh Framework Programme for research, technological development and demonstration [311987]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

As consumers buy with their eyes, colour is considered one of the most important quality parameters of food products. Traditionally, this is defined by human inspection, or measured using a colorimeter or a spectrophotometer. As the first is subjective and prone to factors like fatigue, this is not ideal for industrial use. The second only measures a small area of the food product, making it difficult to get a clear overview of the colour of the whole sample. To overcome these limitations, hyperspectral imaging has been used in this research to measure the postharvest colour of vine tomatoes. Two methods to calculate the colour based on hyperspectral images are compared. The first is the use of a direct method to calculate the colour from the spectra in terms of CIELab-values, while the second method is a soft modelling approach involving multivariate statistics. The soft modelling method was found to achieve the best results (R-L*(2) = 0.86; R-a*(2) = 0.93; R-b*(2) = 0.42, R-Hue(2) = 0.95, R-chroma(2) = 0.51), but its applicability is limited to the range of products on which the models have been trained. The direct method is more generally applicable, but was found to lack robustness against intensity variations due to the curvature and glossiness of the tomatoes. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available