4.7 Article

Compressive ratcheting effect of load paths expanded PTFE considering multiple load paths

Journal

POLYMER TESTING
Volume 61, Issue -, Pages 93-99

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.011

Keywords

Ratcheting; Expanded PTFE; Compressive loads; Stress rate; Multiple load paths

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51305310]
  2. Hubei Provincial Department of Education Science and Technology Research Program [D20161508]
  3. Wuhan Youth Science and technology plan [2016070204010120]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Uniaxial stress-controlled ratcheting behaviors of expanded PTFE (ePTFE) under cyclic compressive loads were tested. The effects of temperature, stress rate and mean stress on the ratcheting behaviors of ePTFE considering multiple load paths were discussed in detail. Results present that the steady ratcheting strain is rate-independent when the stress rate is less than about 0.1 MPa/s, while it approximately linearly decreases with increasing the stress rate for greater stress rate. Additionally, the steady ratcheting is temperature-independent when the temperature is greater than about 150 degrees C, but it nearly linearly increases with enhancing the temperature for lower temperature. Especially, the stress rate almost has little effect on the ratcheting strain of ePTFE at 200 degrees C. Moreover, the accumulated ratcheting strain enhances rapidly in about the first 80 cycles, and subsequently tends to shakedown in the subsequent cycles for each load path. Furthermore, if a higher stress is used in the prior cycling, the greater ratcheting strain may be produced, and a negative ratcheting strain rate can be obtained in the subsequent cycling with lower mean stress due to the greater strain hardening and deformation resistance produced by the previous higher stress. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available