4.3 Review

Growing microbes in millifluidic droplets

Journal

ENGINEERING IN LIFE SCIENCES
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 318-326

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/elsc.201400089

Keywords

Diversity; Droplet; Microbiology; Millifluidics; Screening

Funding

  1. Agence Nationale pour la Recherche grant DigiDiag, 'Investissements d'Avenir' program [ANR-10-NANB-0002-06]
  2. Ministere de la Recherche et de l'Enseignement Superieur
  3. Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR) [ANR-10-NANB-0002] Funding Source: Agence Nationale de la Recherche (ANR)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Microbiology has continuously pushed efforts towards understanding microbial diversity. Technologies and methods have also evolved, from plating, and use of microscopes and cytometers, towards micro-well handling robots and, finally, fluidic-based devices. The aim of this review was to bring microbiologists attention to the outstanding analytical and handling power of millifluidic droplet technologies for analysing and sorting phenotypic diversity in the microbial world. This new format overcomes many limitations of previous approaches. It provides outstanding reproducible growth conditions over droplet reservoirs allowing unprecedented sensitive read-out over thousands of colonies over time. The confinement of the millifluidic train within tubes and the implementation of a three phases format excludes any contamination issues. The automation and handling of reservoir droplets is inherently facilitated. We show as a proof of principle the efficiency of capturing phenotypic diversity within a bacterial sample submitted to a sub-minimum inhibitory concentration of antibiotic. The precision offered by the millifluidic format allows the detection of a variety of resistance strategies that compete and coexist. The review finally explores the potential of this approach to address new challenges such as community-based growth of multiple-strain systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available