4.7 Article

Undrained failure mechanisms of slopes in random soil

Journal

ENGINEERING GEOLOGY
Volume 191, Issue -, Pages 31-35

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.enggeo.2015.03.009

Keywords

Finite element method; Landslides; Shear strength; Slope stability; Stochastic models; Structural reliability

Funding

  1. Research Grants Council, University Grants Committee, Hong Kong [HKUST6/CRF/12R]
  2. National Basic Research Program [2011CB013506]
  3. Centre of Excellence for Geotechnical Science and Engineering, University of Newcastle Australia

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Since the charts of Taylor (1937), it has been well known in engineering geological investigations that the location of the critical failure mechanism in a homogeneous undrained clay slope goes either deep (tangent to a firm base) or shallow (through the toe) depending on whether the slope angle is less than or greater than about 53 degrees. In reality, natural soils always exhibit spatial variability and the above expectations no longer hold true. The objective of this note is to investigate the failure mechanisms and probability of failure of slopes in random undrained soil over a wide range of slope angles. An elastic perfectly plastic finite element method in combination with random field generation, well known as the random finite element method (RFEM), is employed. RFEM represents a powerful tool for slope stability analyses that allow mechanisms to develop naturally within soil masses. It is found that, for certain combinations of random field properties, relatively flat slopes may display a significant number of shallow mechanisms and steeper slopes may display a significant number of deep mechanisms. For a steep slope, the more variable the undrained shear strength, the less likely the slope is to display a toe mechanism. Understanding the uncertainty of failure mechanisms is important because the consequences may be more serious in a deep failure as it involves a greater volume of soil. (C) 2015 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available