4.7 Article

Primary root growth in Arabidopsis thaliana is inhibited by the miR159 mediated repression of MYB33, MYB65 and MYB101

Journal

PLANT SCIENCE
Volume 262, Issue -, Pages 182-189

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2017.06.008

Keywords

miR159; MYB65; Primary root growth; Root meristem; Arabidopsis thaliana

Funding

  1. National Special Science Research Program of China [2013CB967300]
  2. National Transgenic Project of China [2016ZX08010-002]
  3. National High Technology Research and Development Program 863 [2013AA102602-4]
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFD0101902]
  5. National Natural Science Foundation [31500232, 31270328, 30970243, 31471515]
  6. Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province [ZR2014CP002]
  7. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572013]
  8. Science & Technology Plan of Shandong Province [2013GNC11010]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Organ growth is a fundamental developmental process basing on cell proliferation and differentiation. The growth of the plant root is sustained by the activity of the root meristem, a process controlled in part by various transcription factors. Here, the miR159 has been identified as a post transcriptional repressor of root growth, on the basis that the mir159ab double mutant developed a larger meristem than did the wild type, and that it formed longer roots. In the mutant, the abundance of MYB33, MYB65 and MYB101 transcript was substantially increased. When MYB33, MYB65 and MYB101 were replaced by the miR159-resistant forms mMYB33, mMYB65 and mMYB101 respectively, the root meristem was similarly enlarged and the growth of the primary root enhanced. MYB65 activity promoted cell division in the root meristem by accelerating the cell cycle. The data suggest that miR159 acts as a key repressor of the primary root's growth, acting through its repression of MYB65 and consequent blocking of the cell cycle.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available