4.6 Article

Asymmetric MF-DCCA method based on risk conduction and its application in the Chinese and foreign stock markets

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.physa.2016.10.002

Keywords

Stock markets; Cross-correlation; Risk conduction; Asymmetric; DCCA

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71371100, 71271118, 71373131]
  2. Humanities and Social Sciences Fund - Ministry of Education of the People's Republic of China [13YJCZH007]
  3. Key technologies and system development of evaluation of service benefit and losses of typhoon/storm disaster [GYHY(201506015)]
  4. Qing Lan Project of Jiangsu Province
  5. Program for Innovative Research Team of Shanghai University of Finance and Economics
  6. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  7. Flagship Major Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The acceleration of economic globalization gradually shows the linkage of the stock markets in various counties and produces a risk conduction effect. An asymmetric MF-DCCA method is conducted based on the different directions of risk conduction (DMF-ADCCA) and by using the traditional MF-DCCA. To ensure that the empirical results are more objective and robust, this study selects the stock index data of China, the US, Germany, India, and Brazil from January 2011 to September 2014 using the asymmetric MF-DCCA method based on different risk conduction effects and nonlinear Granger causality tests to study the asymmetric cross-correlation between domestic and foreign stock markets. Empirical results indicate the existence of a bidirectional conduction effect between domestic and foreign stock markets, and the greater influence degree from foreign countries to domestic market compared with that from the domestic market to foreign countries. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available