4.2 Article

Photoprotection by sunscreen depends on time spent on application

Journal

PHOTODERMATOLOGY PHOTOIMMUNOLOGY & PHOTOMEDICINE
Volume 34, Issue 2, Pages 117-121

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/phpp.12373

Keywords

sun protection; sunscreen application; sunscreen use

Categories

Funding

  1. Bispbebjerg Hospital

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundTo be effective, sunscreens must be applied in a sufficient quantity and reapplication is recommended. No previous study has investigated whether time spent on sunscreen application is important for the achieved photoprotection. AimTo determine whether time spent on sunscreen application is related to the amount of sunscreen used during a first and second application. MethodsThirty-one volunteers wearing swimwear applied sunscreen twice in a laboratory environment. Time spent and the amount of sunscreen used during each application was measured. Subjects' body surface area accessible for sunscreen application (BSA) was estimated from their height, weight and swimwear worn. The average applied quantity of sunscreen after each application was calculated. ResultsSubjects spent on average 4minutes and 15seconds on the first application and approximately 85% of that time on the second application. There was a linear relationship between time spent on application and amount of sunscreen used during both the first and the second application (P<.0001). Participants applied 2.21grams of sunscreen per minute during both applications. After the first application, subjects had applied a mean quantity of sunscreen of 0.71mg/cm(2) on the BSA, and after the second application, a mean total quantity of 1.27mg/cm(2) had been applied. ConclusionWe found that participants applied a constant amount of sunscreen per minute during both a first and a second application. Measurement of time spent on application of sunscreen on different body sites may be useful in investigating the distribution of sunscreen in real-life settings.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available