4.7 Review

Mechanistic and pharmacologic insights on immune checkpoint inhibitors

Journal

PHARMACOLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 120, Issue -, Pages 1-9

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS LTD- ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.phrs.2017.03.012

Keywords

Immunotherapy; Cancer immunity; CTLA-4; PD-1; PD-L1; Immune checkpoint; Ipilimumab; Pembrolizumab; Nivolumab; Atezolizumab

Funding

  1. NIH [T32 GM007019]
  2. AACR [16-40-15-SWEI]
  3. DOD [CA160315]
  4. Arthur J. Schreiner Family Melanoma Research Fund
  5. J. Edward Mahoney Foundation Research Fund
  6. Brush Family Immunotherapy Fund
  7. Diana and Andrew Da Miano Research Fund

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concept of augmenting the immune system to eradicate cancer dates back at least a century. A major resurgence in cancer immunotherapy has occurred over the past decade since the identification and targeting of negative regulators with antibody therapies to augment the anti-tumor immune response. Unprecedented responses across a broad array of cancer types elevated this class of therapies to the forefront of cancer treatment. The most successful drugs to date target the cytotoxic T-lymphocyte associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) and programmed cell death-1 (PD-1) pathways. The immune biology of these pathways was illuminated through thoughtful pre-clinical experiments over the past 20 years. The characterization of these negative immune regulators, also known as immune checkpoints, subsequently led to the successful clinical development four drugs in six different cancer types to date, and progress continues. Despite these successes, significant challenges remain including the development of predictive biomarkers, recognition and management of immune related toxicities, and elucidating and reversing mechanisms of primary and secondary resistance. Ongoing work is expected to build upon recent accomplishments and allow more patients to benefit from this class of therapies. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available