Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Australian Utility Weights for the EORTC QLU-C10D, a Multi-Attribute Utility Instrument Derived from the Cancer-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire, EORTC QLQ-C30
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
PHARMACOECONOMICS
Volume 36, Issue 2, Pages 225-238
Publisher
Springer Nature
Online
2017-12-21
DOI
10.1007/s40273-017-0582-5
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- The Role of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures in Health Technology Assessment
- (2017) Donna Rowen et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Is Dimension Order Important when Valuing Health States Using Discrete Choice Experiments Including Duration?
- (2016) Brendan Mulhern et al. PHARMACOECONOMICS
- QLU-C10D: a health state classification system for a multi-attribute utility measure based on the EORTC QLQ-C30
- (2016) M. T. King et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Order of Presentation of Dimensions Does Not Systematically Bias Utility Weights from a Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2016) Richard Norman et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- A Systematic Review of the Literature on the Development of Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures of Health
- (2016) Elizabeth Goodwin et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- Using a discrete choice experiment to value the QLU-C10D: feasibility and sensitivity to presentation format
- (2015) R. Norman et al. QUALITY OF LIFE RESEARCH
- Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Myelofibrosis from the EORTC QLQ-C30 and the MF-SAF
- (2015) Clara Mukuria et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Developing and testing methods for deriving preference-based measures of health from condition-specific measures (and other patient-based measures of outcome).
- (2014) JE Brazier et al. HEALTH TECHNOLOGY ASSESSMENT
- Testing a discrete choice experiment including duration to value health states for large descriptive systems: Addressing design and sampling issues
- (2014) Nick Bansback et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- AN AUSTRALIAN DISCRETE CHOICE EXPERIMENT TO VALUE EQ-5D HEALTH STATES
- (2013) Rosalie Viney et al. HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Constructing D-optimal symmetric stated preference discrete choice experiments
- (2013) Fatih Demirkale et al. JOURNAL OF STATISTICAL PLANNING AND INFERENCE
- Valuing SF-6D Health States Using a Discrete Choice Experiment
- (2013) Richard Norman et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Mapping utilities from cancer-specific health-related quality of life instruments: a review of the literature
- (2013) Helen McTaggart-Cowan et al. Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research
- A Pilot Discrete Choice Experiment to Explore Preferences for EQ-5D-5L Health States
- (2013) Richard Norman et al. Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
- The development of a QALY measure for epilepsy: NEWQOL-6D
- (2012) Brendan Mulhern et al. EPILEPSY & BEHAVIOR
- Valuation of the Child Health Utility 9D Index
- (2012) Katherine Stevens PHARMACOECONOMICS
- Estimating Preference-Based Single Index Measures for Dementia Using DEMQOL and DEMQOL-Proxy
- (2012) Donna Rowen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Condition-Specific Preference-Based Measures: Benefit or Burden?
- (2012) Matthijs M. Versteegh et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Kessler Psychological Distress Scale: Normative Data from the 2007 Australian National Survey of Mental Health and Wellbeing
- (2011) Tim Slade et al. AUSTRALIAN AND NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY
- Using a discrete choice experiment to estimate health state utility values
- (2011) Nick Bansback et al. JOURNAL OF HEALTH ECONOMICS
- Time Trade-Off Derived EQ-5D Weights for Australia
- (2011) Rosalie Viney et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Deriving a Preference-Based Measure for Cancer Using the EORTC QLQ-C30
- (2011) Donna Rowen et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- Discrete Choice Modeling for the Quantification of Health States: The Case of the EQ-5D
- (2010) Elly A. Stolk et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
- International Comparisons in Valuing EQ-5D Health States: A Review and Analysis
- (2009) Richard Norman et al. VALUE IN HEALTH
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExplorePublish scientific posters with Peeref
Peeref publishes scientific posters from all research disciplines. Our Diamond Open Access policy means free access to content and no publication fees for authors.
Learn More