4.7 Article

Performance study of solar power plants with CO2 as working fluid. A promising design window

Journal

ENERGY CONVERSION AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 92, Issue -, Pages 36-46

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2014.12.030

Keywords

Multi-tube Fresnel receiver; Regenerative Brayton cycle; Moderate concentration factors

Funding

  1. Institute of Advanced Sustainability Studies of Potsdam, Germany (IASS)
  2. Spanish Grant 'VI Plan Nacional' [ENE2012-37950-C02-02]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper a systematic analysis is reported on the use of CO2 as heat carrier fluid in solar thermal receivers and as thermodynamic working fluid. It includes the performance of close-to-critical regenerative Brayton cycles, which opens a broad field of cycle possibilities with low pressure ratios (very simple turbines) complemented with large but standard heat exchangers as regenerators. Radiation intensities needed to reach relevant efficiencies are in the range above 25 kW/m(2), but receiver efficiencies do not increase significantly beyond that value, featured as a threshold. Receivers are made of multi-tube bundles enclosed in glass-windowed collectors with compensated pressure and dilatation, which eliminates the problem of gas leakage through rotating joints and other non-hermetic fits. This leads to needing concentrators compatible with those collectors, which can be either finely optimized Linear Fresnel Reflectors or central minitowers. CO2 was chosen for this study because its critical temperature (31 degrees C) is very close to environmental temperature, which conveys very positive features for the efficiency of the cycle. The overall result of the theoretical study is the identification of a set of different types of efficient, flexible and robust CSP plants with CO2 as the only fluid which deserves further research at experimental level and in the design and construction of new plant components. (C) 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available