4.6 Article

Effect of Soil C, N and P Stoichiometry on Soil Organic C Fractions After Afforestation

Journal

PEDOSPHERE
Volume 27, Issue 4, Pages 705-713

Publisher

SCIENCE PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/S1002-0160(17)60479-X

Keywords

dissolved organic C; labile organic C; light fraction organic C; microbial biomass C; particulate organic C

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41601578, 41601290, 31270484, 31570440]
  2. Special Fund for Forest Scientific Research in the Public Interest of China [201304312, 201304309]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Northwest University, China [15NW03]
  4. University Association for Science and Technology in Shaanxi, China [20170302]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Afforestation is recognized as an important driving force for soil organic C (SOC) dynamics and soil element cycling. To evaluate the relationships between soil C:N:P stoichiometry and SOC fractions, soil C:N:P stoichiometry distributions at 0-200 cm soil depths were analyzed and the contents of SOC fractions were evaluated in 9 typical land-use systems on the Loess Plateau of China. The contents of light fraction organic C, particulate organic C (> 53, 53-2 000, and > 2 000 mu m), labile organic C, microbial biomass C, and dissolved organic C decreased with increasing soil depth and were higher in afforested soil than in slope cropland soil. Compared with the slope cropland, different vegetation types influenced soil C:N, C:P, and N:P ratios, especially when C:P and N:P ratios were significantly higher (P < 0.05). Moreover, SOC fractions at the 0-10 and 10-40 cm depths were particularly affected by soil C:P ratio, whereas those at the 40-100 and 100-200 cm soil depths were significantly affected (P < 0.05) by soil N:P ratio. These results indicate that changes in SOC fractions are largely driven by soil C:P and N:P ratios at different soil depths after afforestation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available