4.7 Article

Neonatal Morbidity and 1-Year Survival of Extremely Preterm Infants

Journal

PEDIATRICS
Volume 139, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER ACAD PEDIATRICS
DOI: 10.1542/peds.2016-1821

Keywords

-

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVE: To determine 1-year survival and major neonatal morbidities (intracranial abstract hemorrhage grade >2, cystic periventricular leukomalacia, retinopathy of prematurity grade >2, necrotizing enterocolitis, severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia) among extremely preterm infants in Norway in 2013-2014, and to compare the results to the first Norwegian Extreme Prematurity Study 1999-2000 and similar contemporary European populationbased studies. METHODS: Population-based study of all infants born at 22 through 26 weeks' gestation in Norway in 2013-2014. Prospectively collected data were obtained by linking data in the Norwegian Neonatal Network to the Medical Birth Registry of Norway. RESULTS: Of 420 infants (incidence 3.5 per 1000 births), 145 were stillborn (34.5%), 275 were live-born (82.3% of the 334 fetuses alive at admission for obstetrical care), and 251 (91.3% of live-born infants) were admitted to a neonatal unit. The survival among live-born infants was 18% at 22 weeks, 29% at 23 weeks, 56% at 24 weeks, 84% at 25 weeks and 90% at 26 weeks (for each week increment in gestational age: odds ratio 3.3; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-4.4). Among infants surviving to 1 year of age, major neonatal morbidity was diagnosed in 55%. Decreasing gestational age was moderately associated with rates of major morbidity (odds ratio 1.6; 95% confidence interval, 1.2-2.2). CONCLUSIONS: Compared to the previous 1999-2000 cohort, the rate of stillbirth before admission to an obstetrical unit increased, whereas the survival rate among live born infants was similar in our 2013-2014 cohort. Neonatal morbidity rates remain high among extremely preterm infants.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available