4.7 Article

Selective Weakly Supervised Human Detection under Arbitrary Poses

Journal

PATTERN RECOGNITION
Volume 65, Issue -, Pages 223-237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.12.025

Keywords

Weakly supervised learning; Human detection; Selective Weakly Supervised Detection (SWSD); Multi-instance learning (MIL)

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation of China [61373060, 61672280]
  2. Qing Lan Project

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this paper we study the problem of weakly supervised human detection under arbitrary poses within the framework of multi-]instance learning (MIL). Our contributions are threefold: (1) we first show that in the context of weakly supervised learning, some commonly used bagging tools in MIL such as the Noisy-]OR model or the ISR model tend to suffer from the problem of gradient magnitude reduction when the initial instance level detector is weak and/or when there exist large number of negative proposals, resulting in extremely inefficient use of training examples. We hence advocate the use of more robust and simple max-]pooling rule or average rule under such circumstances; (2) we propose a new Selective Weakly Supervised Detection (SWSD) algorithm, which is shown to outperform several previous state-of-the-art weakly supervised methods; (3) finally, we identify several crucial factors that may significantly influence the performance, such as the usefulness of a small amount of supervision information, the need of relatively higher RoP (Ratio of Positive Instances), and so on these factors are shown to benefit the MIL-]based weakly supervised detector but are less studied in the previous literature. We also annotate a new large-scale data set called LSP/MPII-MPHB (Multiple Poses Human Body), in which and another popular benchmark dataset we demonstrate the superiority of the proposed method compared to several previous state-of-the-art methods.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available