4.5 Article

Trajectories of mental and physical functioning among spouse caregivers of cancer survivors over the first five years following the diagnosis

Journal

PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
Volume 100, Issue 6, Pages 1213-1221

Publisher

ELSEVIER IRELAND LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2016.12.031

Keywords

Cancer; Quality of life; Mental functioning; Physical health; Psychosocial oncology; Spouses

Funding

  1. Cancer Council NSW
  2. National Health and Medical Research Council Research Fellowship [APP1012869]
  3. FRQS
  4. Cancer Institute New South Wales Grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Identify the trajectories of physical and mental functioning among spouse caregivers of patients with cancer over the first five years post-diagnosis and variables associated with low or deteriorating functioning. Methods: Caregivers completed a survey at 6 months and 1, 2, 3.5, and 5 years post-patient diagnosis, including the SF-12 for quality of life (QOL). SF-12 Mental Component Summary (MCS, n = 299) and Physical Component Summary (PCS, n = 300) scores were analyzed using SAS. Results: Five trajectories for PCS were identified, the top three were: (a) high PCS (53.0%); (b) steady decline in PCS (17.0%); and (c) steady increase, but remaining below population norm (16.7%). Five trajectories for MCS were also identified, the top two being: (a) high MCS (45.8%) and (b) MCS comparable to population norm (27.8%). Variables associated with low or deteriorating QOL included depression, social support, coping, burden, and/or unmet needs. Conclusions: This is the first study to document spouse caregivers' QOL over the first five years post-patient diagnosis. Although many participants experienced high functioning, almost a third reported low or deteriorating mental or physical functioning. Practice implications: Variables associated with low or deteriorating mental and physical functioning can be targeted in future interventions. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available