4.5 Article

Decreased expression of microRNA-122 is associated with an unfavorable prognosis in childhood acute myeloid leukemia and function analysis indicates a therapeutic potential

Journal

PATHOLOGY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE
Volume 213, Issue 9, Pages 1166-1172

Publisher

ELSEVIER GMBH, URBAN & FISCHER VERLAG
DOI: 10.1016/j.prp.2017.06.017

Keywords

Childhood acute myeloid leukemia; microRNA-122; Prognosis; Cell proliferation; Tumor suppressor

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

MicroRNA (miR)-122 functions as a tumor suppressor in various human cancers. However, its involvement in childhood acute myeloid leukemia (AML) remains unknown. In this study, quantitative real-time PCR assay demonstrated that miR-122 expression in bone marrow specimens from AML children were significantly lower than that in non-malignant controls (P < 0.001). Statistically, AML children with low miR-122 expression more frequently had large white blood cell count (P = 0.022), French-American-British classification subtype M7 (P < 0.001), unfavorable cytogenetics (P = 0.002) and day 7 response to the treatment (P = 0.036), short relapse-free (P = 0.001) and overall (P = 0.008) survivals than those with high expression. Multivariate analysis also determined that miR-122 expression was an independent prognostic factor for both relapse-free and overall survivals. Functionally, the enforced expression of miR-122 in AML cell lines efficiently suppressed cell proliferation and reduced the ratio of S-phase cells in vitro (all P < 0.05). In conclusion, the abnormal expression of miR-122 may be a marker of the aggressive progression in childhood AML. Importantly, its downregulation may serve as a prognostic factor to predict poor outcome. Our study also reveal that miR-122 may function as a tumor suppressor in childhood AML, highlighting a new therapeutic strategy for this malignancy. (C) 2017 Published by Elsevier GmbH.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available