4.7 Article Proceedings Paper

Moderate or Intense Low-Oxygen Dilution Combustion of Methane Diluted by CO2 and N2

Journal

ENERGY & FUELS
Volume 29, Issue 7, Pages 4576-4585

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.5b00511

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Special Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China [20110001130014]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2014M550011]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51276002, 51406001]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Moderate or intense low-oxygen dilution (MILD) combustion is regarded as one of the most effective technologies to achieve extremely low NO emissions of combustion. MILD combustion diluted by CO2 and by N-2 are herein termed MILD oxy-combustion and MILD air combustion, respectively. The present study is to investigate the difference of the two by experimental observation in a furnace of 20 kW and chemical kinetics calculation of a well-stirred reactor (WSR). Also, to identify their difference in mechanism, reaction paths of combustion diluted with N-2 and CO2 are examined. It is revealed that the region of MILD oxy-combustion is notably larger than that of MILD air combustion for gaseous fuels, which suggests that the requirement for establishing MILD combustion is less stringent with dilution by CO2 than by N-2. The key reason is that the CO2 dilution substantially lowers the temperature rise because of combustion, delays the ignition, and slows the overall reaction rate, thus facilitating the occurrence of MILD combustion. Detailed analyses show that the temperature reduction derives from the physical effect of CO2 dilution, while the ignition delay results mainly from the chemical effect. Moreover, the investigation of reaction paths suggests that the CO2 dilution increases the local CO production mainly through H + CO2 --> OH + CO and CO2 + CH2(s) --> CO + CH2O.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available