4.5 Article

Mechanism of linear covariations between isotopic compositions of natural gaseous hydrocarbons

Journal

ORGANIC GEOCHEMISTRY
Volume 113, Issue -, Pages 115-123

Publisher

PERGAMON-ELSEVIER SCIENCE LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.orggeochem.2017.07.003

Keywords

Carbon isotopes; Hydrogen isotopes; Natural gas; Kinetic isotopic fractionation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Linear covariations between stable isotopic compositions of methane, ethane and propane have long been observed in natural gas accumulations; e.g., a plot of delta C-13(propane) versus delta C-13(ethane) of natural gas fall along a straight line. This work investigates physicochemical mechanisms behind the correlations and derives the theoretical slope value for each correlation line. Most slopes are close to the values of statistical distribution, which are 2/3 (0.67) for delta C-13(propane) vs. delta C-13(ethane), 2 for delta C-13(methane) vs. delta C-13(ethane), and 3/4 (0.75) for delta H-2(propane) vs. delta H-2(ethane). When detailed kinetic isotopic effects are considered, the theoretical slope values of delta C-13(propane) vs. delta C-13(ethane) and delta H-2(propane) vs. delta H-2(ethane) change slightly to 0.68 and 0.73, respectively; the slope of delta C-13(methane) vs. delta C-13(ethane) is about 2.4. These slopes are consistent to field data of natural gas generated from kerogen before dry gas window. An exception is the slope of the delta H-2(methane) vs. delta H-2(ethane) correlation line; the deviation of field data from theoretical slope suggests that the reaction path of methane generation differs from that of ethane and propane generation; proton shift is probably involved in methane generation. The physical meanings of intra-molecular isotopic fractionation in propane and clumped isotopic fractionation in methane are discussed based on statistical and kinetic analysis. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available