4.6 Article

Rational design, synthesis, and biological evaluation of Pan-Raf inhibitors to overcome resistance

Journal

ORGANIC & BIOMOLECULAR CHEMISTRY
Volume 15, Issue 16, Pages 3455-3465

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c7ob00518k

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21572273/B020601]
  2. Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions
  3. College Student Innovation Project for the R&D of Novel Drugs [J1030830]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Selective BRaf(V600E) inhibitors with DFG-in conformation have been proven effective against a subset of melanoma. However, representative inhibitor vemurafenib rapidly acquires resistance in the BRaf(WT) cells through a CRaf or BRaf(WT) dependent manner. Simultaneous targeting of all subtypes of Raf proteins offers the prospect of enhanced efficacy as well as reduced potential for acquired resistance. Herein, we describe the design and characterization of a series of compounds I-01-I-22, based on a pyrimidine scaffold with DFG-out conformation as Pan-Raf inhibitors. Among them, I-15 binds to all Raf protomers with IC50 values of 12.6 nM (BRaf(V600E)), 30.1 nM (ARaf), 19.7 nM (BRaf(WT)) and 17.5 nM (CRaf) and demonstrates cellular activity against BRaf(WT) phenotypic melanoma and BRaf(V600E) phenotypic colorectal cancer cells. The western blot results for the P-Erk inhibition in human melanoma SK-Mel-2 cell line showed that I-15 inhibited the proliferation of the SK-Mel-2 cell line at concentrations as low as 400 nM, without paradoxical activation of Erk as vemurafenib, which supported that I-15 may become a good candidate compound to overcome the resistance of melanoma induced by vemurafenib. I-15 also has a favorable pharmacokinetic profile in rats. Rational design, synthesis, SAR, lead selection and evaluation of the key compounds studied are described.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available