4.6 Article

Association of sickle cell haemoglobinopathies with dental and jaw bone abnormalities

Journal

ORAL DISEASES
Volume 24, Issue 3, Pages 393-403

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/odi.12742

Keywords

dental radiography; maxillofacial abnormalities; sickle cell anaemia; sickle cell trait

Funding

  1. Research Foundation for Scientific and Technological Development of Maranhao (Fundacao de Amparo a Pesquisa e ao Desenvolvimento Cientifico e Tecnologico do Maranhao-FAPEMA) in Sao Luis-MA, Brazil [00540/12]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveTo estimate the association between sickle cell anaemia and trait with dental and jaw bone abnormalities. Subjects and MethodsSubjects (n=369) were allocated to three groups: sickle cell anaemia, trait and control. Dental shape, number, size and position and changes in pulp chamber, root and periapex were analysed by intra-oral periapical radiographs. Integrity of lamina dura, quality of cancellous bone and bone trabeculation were also evaluated. Prevalence ratios (PR) were calculated (=0.05). ResultsSickle cell anaemia had higher prevalence (PR:8.31) and number of teeth (PR:13.40) with external resorption; higher number of teeth with pulp calcification; partial and total loss of lamina dura; and higher prevalence of changes in trabecular structure of maxilla (PR:6.45) and mandible (PR:5.34). Sickle cell trait showed higher prevalence (PR:1.26) and higher number of teeth (PR:1.98) with partial loss of lamina dura; higher number of teeth with hypercementosis, changes in shape, size, periapex, total loss of lamina dura; and higher prevalence of changes in mandibular trabecular bone (PR:1.43). ConclusionPulp calcification and external resorption of the root were the most frequent dental alterations in sickle cell anaemia group, while in trait was higher frequency of changes in shape, size, periapex and root. Jaw bone changes were most prevalent in both homozygous and heterozygous subjects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available