4.6 Article

Boosting magnetic field enhancement with radiative couplings of magnetic modes in dielectric nanostructures

Journal

OPTICS EXPRESS
Volume 25, Issue 14, Pages 15927-15937

Publisher

OPTICAL SOC AMER
DOI: 10.1364/OE.25.015927

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [2017JJ3408]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) [61222406, 11174371]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Dielectric nanostructures can readily support considerable magnetic field enhancements that offer great potential applications in field enhanced spectroscopies. However, the magnetic fields of dielectric structures are usually distributed within the entire volume, which brings challenge to the further increment of the magnetic field enhancement. Here, we theoretically demonstrate that the magnetic field enhancement in dielectric nanostructures can be boosted through the radiative couplings of magnetic modes. Our concentric structure consists of a hollow disk and a ring. The disk has a magnetic dipole mode. The ring has two magnetic dipole modes that are out of phase. Strong radiative interactions between the modes on the disk and the ring can occur, which result in a net constructive coupling effect. For a lossless material with n = 3.3, a sharp peak can be obtained on the scattering spectrum of the coupled system due to the radiative interactions. The corresponding resonant magnetic field enhancement at the disk center reaches 96 times. This enhancement is about 7 times higher than that of an individual disk. The structure with a lossy material Si is also considered, where radiative couplings and boosted magnetic field can also be obtained. Our research reveals the strong radiative mode couplings in dielectric structures and is important for furthering our understanding on the light-matter interactions at the nanoscale. (C) 2017 Optical Society of America

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available