4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of altered miRNA expression in whole blood of OSCC patients

Journal

ONCOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 37, Issue 6, Pages 3467-3474

Publisher

SPANDIDOS PUBL LTD
DOI: 10.3892/or.2017.5639

Keywords

OSCC; recurrence; whole peripheral blood; miRNA expression; RT-qPCR

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Currently, there is a lack of blood markers for the detection of recurrent oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). The present study aimed to investigate whether the aberrant expression of single microRNAs (miRNAs) in whole blood of patients could serve as a biomarker for persistent or recurrent OSCC. Whole blood of 2 groups of formerly treated OSCC patients was investigated by RT-qPCR for their circulating miRNA profiles. The R-OC group included patients with recurrence of OSCC (n=21) and the NR-OC group included patients without recurrence (n=21). Fold-changes and significance of the differences in miRNA expression levels between the groups were determined. A cut-off point (COP) for the discrimination between the R-OC and NR-OC groups was calculated and the significance between over/under expression of the miRNAs and the recurrence of malignancy was determined. Significant differences in the miRNA expression in whole blood of the R-OC and NR-OC groups were found. The levels of miR-3651 and miR-494 were significantly increased and the level of miR-186 was significantly decreased in whole blood of the R-OC patients (p(miR-3651)=0.001, p(miR-494)=0.003 and PmiR-186=0.001). By the determination of the COP, increased or decreased expression of the markers was significantly correlated to the recurrence of the disease. Altered expression of miR-494, miR-3651 and miR-186 appears to be associated with the recurrence of OSCC. The present study may form the basis for establishing a blood test as a minimally invasive method for the detection of the recurrence of OSCC.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available