4.5 Article

Vitamin-D status and neurodevelopment and growth in young north Indian children: a secondary data analysis

Journal

NUTRITION JOURNAL
Volume 16, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12937-017-0285-y

Keywords

Vitamin-D; ASQ-3; Neurodevelopment; Physical growth; Young north Indian children

Funding

  1. Centre for Intervention Science in Maternal and Child Health (CISMAC) [250216]
  2. South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority [2012090]
  3. Thrasher Research Fund [9144]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Vitamin-D deficiency has been linked with impaired development in animal studies; however, the evidence from human studies is scanty. Evidence as to whether vitamin-D deficiency during early childhood affects growth is also limited and conflicting. We examined the extent to which vitamin-D deficiency (< 10 ng/ml) is associated with neurodevelopment and physical growth in young children. Methods: We used data from a randomized controlled trial (RCT) of daily folic acid and/or vitamin B12 supplementation for six months in children aged 6 to 30 months conducted in Delhi, India. We measured vitamin-D status and neurodevelopment by the Ages and Stages Questionnaire-3 (ASQ-3) at 12 to 36 months of age. Multiple logistic and linear regressions were used to examine the association between vitamin-D deficiency at baseline and neurodevelopment and growth 6 months follow-up. Results: 25-hydroxy-vitamin-D (25OHD) concentration was measured at baseline for 960 (96%) children. Of these, 331 (34.5%) children were vitamin-D deficient. The total and subscale (except for the Personal social scale) ASQ-3 scores, were not different between the vitamin-D deficient and non-deficient children. Vitamin-D deficiency was also not associated with physical growth at baseline and at follow - up. Conclusion: Our data do not support the hypothesis that vitamin-D deficiency is associated with poor growth and neurodevelopment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available