4.8 Article

Bayesian prediction of RNA translation from ribosome profiling

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 45, Issue 6, Pages 2960-2972

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkw1350

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Klaus Tschira Stiftung GmbH [00.219b.2013]
  2. Swiss National Science Foundation through the NCCR RNA Disease
  3. European Union [241985]
  4. Klaus Tschira Stiftung [00.219b.2013]
  5. European Research Council (ERC) [241985] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ribosome profiling via high-throughput sequencing (ribo-seq) is a promising new technique for characterizing the occupancy of ribosomes on messenger RNA (mRNA) at base-pair resolution. The ribosome is responsible for translating mRNA into proteins, so information about its occupancy offers a detailed view of ribosome density and position which could be used to discover new translated open reading frames (ORFs), among other things. In this work, we propose RP-BP, an unsupervised Bayesian approach to predict translated ORFs from ribosome profiles. We use state-of-the-art Markov chain Monte Carlo techniques to estimate posterior distributions of the likelihood of translation of each ORF. Hence, an important feature of RP-BP is its ability to incorporate and propagate uncertainty in the prediction process. A second novel contribution is automatic Bayesian selection of read lengths and ribosome P-site offsets (BPPS). We empirically demonstrate that our read length selection technique modestly improves sensitivity by identifying more canonical and non-canonical ORFs. Proteomics-and quantitative translation initiation sequencing-based validation verifies the high quality of all of the predictions. Experimental comparison shows that RP-BP results in more peptide identifications and proteomics-validated ORF predictions compared to another recent tool for translation prediction.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available