4.8 Article

The Pancreatic Expression Database: 2018 update

Journal

NUCLEIC ACIDS RESEARCH
Volume 46, Issue D1, Pages D1107-D1110

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/nar/gkx955

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund [Tissue Bank grant]
  2. Cancer Research UK [A12008]
  3. Breast Cancer Campaign [Tissue Bank Bioinformatics grant] [TB2016BIF]
  4. Cancer Research UK [12008] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Pancreatic Expression Database (PED, http://www.pancreasexpression.org) continues to be a major resource for mining pancreatic -omics data a decade after its initial release. Here, we present recent updates to PED and describe its evolution into a comprehensive resource for extracting, analysing and integrating publicly available multiomics datasets. A new analytical module has been implemented to run in parallel with the existing literature mining functions. This analytical module has been created using rich data content derived from pancreas-related specimens available through the major data repositories (GEO, ArrayExpress) and international initiatives (TCGA, GENIE, CCLE). Researchers have access to a host of functions to tailor analyses to meet their needs. Results are presented using interactive graphics that allow the molecular data to be visualized in a user-friendly manner. Furthermore, researchers are provided with the means to superimpose layers of molecular information to gain greater insight into alterations and the relationships between them. The literature-mining module has been improved with a redesigned web appearance, restructured query platforms and updated annotations. These updates to PED are in preparation for its integration with the Pancreatic Cancer Research Fund Tissue Bank (PCRFTB), a vital resource of pancreas cancer tissue for researchers to support and promote cutting-edge research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available