4.5 Article

Study on the reactor core barrel instantaneous characteristics in case of Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA) scenarios for loop-type PWR

Journal

NUCLEAR ENGINEERING AND DESIGN
Volume 324, Issue -, Pages 93-102

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.nucengdes.2017.08.023

Keywords

Instantaneous force; Reactor core barrel; System analysis; LOCA

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600797]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11705139]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The asymmetric pressure wave caused by Loss of Coolant Accident (LOCA)transients in multi-loop type Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) leads to great shock to the reactor core barrel. The instantaneous shock causes severe damage to the reactor vessel structure integrity. In this paper, a new method for reactor core barrel instantaneous force calculation was proposed based on the widely accepted reactor system analysis code RELAP5. The reliability of RELAP5 code for pipe blow down and pressure wave propagation simulation was assessed against Edward pipe problem firstly. Then the typical three-loop PWR system model was established utilizing Symbolic Nuclear Analysis Package (SNAP) software and the small break LOCA scenarios with different break diameters and break locations were analyzed. The maximum instantaneous asymmetric force applied on the reactor core barrel was achieved under various break conditions, providing the boundary conditions for the core barrel stress distribution and deformation calculation. Results show that the cold leg break LOCA transient leads to great instantaneous asymmetric force, while the hot leg break LOCA transient has no obvious asymmetric force generated. The core barrel instantaneous stress concentration and deformation were discovered. This research could contribute to the reliability assessment of PWR core barrel under LOCA scenarios.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available