4.7 Article

Visual discrimination training improves Humphrey perimetry in chronic cortically induced blindness

Journal

NEUROLOGY
Volume 88, Issue 19, Pages 1856-1864

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0000000000003921

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIH [EY021209, P30 EY001319, T32 EY007125]
  2. Research to Prevent Blindness (RPB) Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: To assess if visual discrimination training improves performance on visual perimetry tests in chronic stroke patients with visual cortex involvement. Methods: 24-2 and 10-2 Humphrey visual fields were analyzed for 17 chronic cortically blind stroke patients prior to and following visual discrimination training, as well as in 5 untrained, cortically blind controls. Trained patients practiced direction discrimination, orientation discrimination, or both, at nonoverlapping, blind field locations. All pretraining and posttraining discrimination performance and Humphrey fields were collected with online eye tracking, ensuring gaze-contingent stimulus presentation. Results: Trained patients recovered similar to 108 degrees(2) of vision on average, while untrained patients spontaneously improved over an area of similar to 16 degrees(2). Improvement was not affected by patient age, time since lesion, size of initial deficit, or training type, but was proportional to the amount of training performed. Untrained patients counterbalanced their improvements with worsening of sensitivity over similar to 9 degrees(2) of their visual field. Worsening wasminimal in trained patients. Finally, although discrimination performance improved at all trained locations, changes in Humphrey sensitivity occurred both within trained regions and beyond, extending over a larger area along the blind field border. Conclusions: In adults with chronic cortical visual impairment, the blind field border appears to have enhanced plastic potential, which can be recruited by gaze-controlled visual discrimination training to expand the visible field. Our findings underscore a critical need for future studies to measure the effects of vision restoration approaches on perimetry in larger cohorts of patients.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available