4.2 Article

Association of glutathione S-transferases M1, P1 and T1 variations and risk of late-onset Alzheimer's disease

Journal

NEUROLOGICAL RESEARCH
Volume 40, Issue 1, Pages 41-44

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/01616412.2017.1390902

Keywords

Association study; Alzheimer's disease; glutathione S-transferase; polymorphism

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective: Late-onset Alzheimer's disease (AD) is a genetically heterogeneous neurodegenerative disorder. Associations of the glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) polymorphisms with the risk factors for AD have not been definitely confirmed. We investigated the association of GSTM1 and GSTT1 null deletion and GSTP1 313 A/G polymorphisms and the risk of AD in an Iranian population. Methods: The case group consisted of 280 individuals with AD and the control group included 168 age-matched healthy individuals. The genotyping of the GSTP1 polymorphism was determined by PCR-RFLP and the GSTM1 and GSTT1 deletions were done by multiplex PCR method. Results: The GSTP1 AG genotype was significantly lower (p = 0.005; OR = 0.57, 95% CI: 0.38-0.84) in the patients (41.1%) than the control group (56.5%). The GSTM1 null genotype was significantly higher (p < 0.001) in the patients (40.5%) than the control group (15.8%). The GSTT1 null genotype was significantly higher (p < 0.038) in the patients (31.2%) than the control group (21.5%). The patients homozygous for the GSTM1 and GSTT1 null alleles showed a 3.5 and 1.5-fold increased risk of AD, respectively. There were interaction between GSTP1 AG genotype and absence of APOE e4 allele (p = 0.001), as well as presence of APOE e4 and GSTM1 null genotype (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: These findings suggested that GSTM1 and GSTT1 null deletions may be associated with susceptibility to AD and people with APOE e4 and GSTM1 null deletion have a higher increased risk for Late-onset AD in Iranian population.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available