3.9 Article

Sex-specific inhibition and stimulation of worker-reproductive transition in a termite

Journal

SCIENCE OF NATURE
Volume 104, Issue 9-10, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER HEIDELBERG
DOI: 10.1007/s00114-017-1501-5

Keywords

Caste differentiation; Developmental plasticity; Ergatoid reproductive; Reticulitermes flavipes

Funding

  1. International Union for the Study of Social Insects (North American Section)
  2. University of Kentucky
  3. US Department of Agriculture (USDA) National Institute of Food and Agriculture (NIFA) [1004654]
  4. NIFA [811671, 1004654] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In social insects, the postembryonic development of individuals exhibits strong phenotypic plasticity in response to the environment, thus generating the caste system. Different from eusocial Hymenoptera, in which queens dominate reproduction and inhibit worker fertility, the primary reproductive caste in termites (kings and queens) can be replaced by neotenic reproductives derived from functionally sterile individuals. Feedback regulation of nestmate differentiation into reproductives has been suggested, but the sex specificity remains inconclusive. In the eastern subterranean termite, Reticulitermes flavipes, we tested the hypothesis that neotenic reproductives regulate worker-reproductive transition in a sex-specific manner. With this R. flavipes system, we demonstrate a sex-specific regulatory mechanism with both inhibitory and stimulatory functions. Neotenics inhibit workers of the same sex from differentiating into additional reproductives but stimulate workers of the opposite sex to undergo this transition. Furthermore, this process is not affected by the presence of soldiers. Our results highlight the reproductive plasticity of termites in response to social cues and provide insights into the regulation of reproductive division of labor in a hemimetabolous social insect.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available