4.8 Article

Chemical and mechanical modulation of polymeric micelle assembly

Journal

NANOSCALE
Volume 9, Issue 16, Pages 5194-5204

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c6nr08414a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [1R01 HL109192]
  2. Korea Institute of Industrial Technology [JE 140004]
  3. Dow Graduate Fellowship
  4. DuPont Graduate Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, polymeric micelles self-assembled from amphiphilic polymers have been studied for various industrial and biomedical applications. This nanoparticle self-assembly typically occurs in a solventexchange process. In this process, the quality of the resulting particles is uncontrollably mediated by polymeric solubility and mixing conditions. Here, we hypothesized that improving the solubility of an amphiphilic polymer in an organic solvent via chemical modification while controlling the mixing rate of organic and aqueous phases would enhance control over particle morphology and size. We examined this hypothesis by synthesizing a poly(2-hydroxyethyl) aspartamide (PHEA) grafted with controlled numbers of octadecyl (C18) chains and oligovaline groups (termed oligovaline-PHEA-C-18). The mixing rate of DMF and water was controlled either by microfluidic mixing of laminar DMF and water flows or through turbulent bulk mixing. Interestingly, oligovaline-PHEA-C18 exhibited an increased solubility in DMF compared with PHEA-C18, as demonstrated by an increase of mixing energy. In addition, increasing the mixing rate between water and DMF using the microfluidic mixer resulted in a decrease of the diameter of the resulting polymeric micelles, as compared with the particles formed from a bulk mixing process. Overall, these findings will expand the parameter space available to control particle self-assembly while also serving to improve existing nanoparticle processing techniques.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available