4.7 Article

Constraining the relative velocity effect using the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 470, Issue 3, Pages 2723-2735

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnras/stx1196

Keywords

gravitation; surveys; cosmological parameters; dark energy; large-scale structure of Universe; cosmology: observations

Funding

  1. UK Space Agency [ST/N00180X/1]
  2. NASA [NNX15AL17G]
  3. UK Space Agency [ST/N00180X/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  4. NASA [NNX15AL17G, 799149] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We analyse the power spectrum of the Baryon Oscillation Spectroscopic Survey (BOSS) Data Release 12 to constrain the relative velocity effect, which represents a potential systematic for measurements of the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) scale. The relative velocity effect is sourced by the different evolution of baryon and cold dark matter perturbations before decoupling. Our power spectrum model includes all one-loop redshift-space terms corresponding to nu(bc) parametrized by the bias parameter b(nu)(2). We also include the linear terms proportional to the relative density, delta(bc), and relative velocity dispersion, theta(bc), which we parametrize with the bias parameters b(delta)(bc) and b(theta)(bc). Our data does not support a detection of the relative velocity effect in any of these parameters. Combining the low-and high-redshift bins of BOSS, we find limits of b(v)(2) = 0.012 +/- 0.015 (+/-0.031), b(delta)(bc) = -1.0 +/- 2.5 (+/-6.2) and b(theta)(bc) = -114 +/- 55 (+/-175) with 68 per cent (95 per cent) confidence levels. These constraints restrict the potential systematic shift in D-A(z), H(z) and f sigma(8), due to the relative velocity, to 1 per cent, 0.8 per cent and 2 per cent, respectively. Given the current uncertainties on the BAO measurements of BOSS, these shifts correspond to 0.53 sigma, 0.5 sigma and 0.22 sigma for D-A(z), H(z) and f sigma(8), respectively.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available