4.6 Article

Optimization of Ultrasound-Assisted Extraction of Antioxidants from the Mung Bean Coat

Journal

MOLECULES
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/molecules22040638

Keywords

mung bean coat; antioxidant; ultrasound-assisted extraction; optimization; response surface methodology; waste; value-added utilization

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81372976]
  2. Key Project of Guangdong Provincial Science and Technology Program [2014B020205002]
  3. Hundred-Talents Scheme of Sun Yat-Sen University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Mung bean (Vigna radiata) sprout is commonly consumed as a vegetable, while the coat of the germinated mung bean is a waste. In this paper, an ultrasound-assisted extraction method has been developed to extract natural antioxidants from the seed coat of mung bean. Several experimental parameters-which included ethanol concentration, solvent/material ratio, ultrasound extraction time, temperature, and power-were studied in single-factor experiments. The interaction of three key experimental parameters (ethanol concentration, solvent/material ratio, and ultrasonic extraction time) was further investigated by response surface method. Besides, traditional extracting methods, including maceration and Soxhlet extraction methods, were also carried out for comparison. The results suggested that the best extracting condition was 37.6% (v/v) of ethanol concentration, 35.1: 1 mL/g of solvent/material ratio and ultrasonic extraction of 46.1 min at 70 degrees C under 500 W ultrasonic irradiation. The antioxidant capacity (178.28 +/- 7.39 mu mol Trolox/g DW) was much stronger than those obtained by the maceration extraction process (158.66 +/- 4.73 mu mol Trolox/g DW) and the Soxhlet extraction process (138.42 +/- 3.63 mu mol Trolox/g DW). In addition, several antioxidant components in the extract were identified and quantified. This study is helpful for value-added utilization of the waste from germinated mung bean.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available