4.7 Article

Identification of Characteristic Components and Foodstuffs in Healthy Japanese Diet and the Health Effects of a Diet with Increased Use Frequency of these Foodstuffs

Journal

MOLECULAR NUTRITION & FOOD RESEARCH
Volume 61, Issue 12, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/mnfr.201700430

Keywords

CE-TOFMS; ICP-MS; Japanese diet; LC-TOFMS; principal component analysis

Funding

  1. Integration research for agriculture and interdisciplinary fields, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries of Japan
  2. Canon Foundation
  3. Grants-in-Aid for Scientific Research [16J00821] Funding Source: KAKEN

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Scope Our recent study showed that the 1975 Japanese diet exhibited strong health benefits. In the current study, we aimed to develop a diet with even higher health benefits. Methods First, to determine the characteristic components in the 1975 diet, we used mass spectrometry for analysis of Japanese diets from several years and performed principal component analysis. Next, a diet with an increased use frequency of foodstuffs contained characteristic components (the modified diet) was prepared and fed to mice. Results Performed principal component analysis revealed that the 1975 diet contained 14 characteristic components that were found in fish, fruits, vegetables, seaweed, soybean foods, soup stock dashi, and fermented seasoning. Based on these, the modified diet was prepared and fed to mice. The liver total cholesterol and serum LDL cholesterol decreased significantly in mice fed the modified diet and serum total cholesterol showed a downward trend, compared to mice fed the 1975 diet. There was no difference between the modified diet and the control groups. In addition, serum adiponectin level increased in mice fed the modified diet and serum TBARS and IL-6 levels decreased. Conclusion By modifying the 1975 diet, it was possible to make a diet with more benefit.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available