4.4 Article

Excess coenzyme A reduces skeletal muscle performance and strength in mice overexpressing human PANK2

Journal

MOLECULAR GENETICS AND METABOLISM
Volume 120, Issue 4, Pages 350-362

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.02.001

Keywords

Coenzyme A; Muscle; Mitochondria; Transgenic mice; Pantothenate kinase

Funding

  1. West Virginia University's School of Medicine [10020452.15.F2R226W]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NS091590, GM119528, HL128485, NEI025536, GM062896]
  3. Cancer Center Support Grant [CA21765]
  4. American Lebanese Syrian Associated Charities
  5. Department of Defense [BC142286]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coenzyme A (CoA) is a cofactor that is central to energy metabolism and CoA synthesis is controlled by the enzyme pantothenate kinase (PanK). A transgenic mouse strain expressing human PANK2 was derived to determine the physiological impact of PANIC overexpression and elevated CoA levels. The Tg(PANK2) mice expressed high levels of the transgene in skeletal muscle and heart; however, CoA was substantially elevated only in skeletal muscle, possibly associated with the comparatively low endogenous levels of acetyl-CoA, a potent feedback inhibitor of PANK2. Tg(PANK2) mice were smaller, had less skeletal muscle mass and displayed significantly impaired exercise tolerance and grip strength. Skeletal myofibers were characterized by centralized nuclei and aberrant mitochondria. Both the content of fully assembled complex I of the electron transport chain and ATP levels were reduced, while markers of oxidative stress were elevated in Tg(PANK2) skeletal muscle. These abnormalities were not detected in the Tg(PANK2) heart muscle, with the exception of spotty loss of cristae organization in the mitochondria. The data demonstrate that excessively high CoA may be detrimental to skeletal muscle function. (C) 2017 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available