Journal
MINDS AND MACHINES
Volume 27, Issue 1, Pages 37-77Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11023-017-9428-3
Keywords
Uncertainty in reasoning; Interpretation; Logic programming; Dynamic norms; Neural-symbolic integration
Categories
Ask authors/readers for more resources
This article aims to achieve two goals: to show that probability is not the only way of dealing with uncertainty (and even more, that there are kinds of uncertainty which are for principled reasons not addressable with probabilistic means); and to provide evidence that logic-based methods can well support reasoning with uncertainty. For the latter claim, two paradigmatic examples are presented: logic programming with Kleene semantics for modelling reasoning from information in a discourse, to an interpretation of the state of affairs of the intended model, and a neural-symbolic implementation of input/output logic for dealing with uncertainty in dynamic normative contexts.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available