4.1 Article

Petrographic and geochemical evidence for multiphase formation of carbonates in the Martian orthopyroxenite Allan Hills 84001

Journal

METEORITICS & PLANETARY SCIENCE
Volume 52, Issue 6, Pages 1030-1047

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/maps.12851

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministry of Science and Innovation [AYA2011-26,522, AYA 2015-67175-P, CTQ2015-62,635-ERC, CTQ2014-60,119-P]
  2. UK Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002960/1, ST/K000942/1, ST/L002167/1]
  3. Spanish MINECO through the Severo Ochoa Centers of Excellence Program [SEV-2013-0295, SEV-2015-0496]
  4. STFC [ST/H002960/1, ST/K000942/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  5. Science and Technology Facilities Council [ST/H002960/1, ST/K000942/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  6. UK Space Agency [ST/L002167/1] Funding Source: researchfish

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Martian meteorites can provide valuable information about past environmental conditions on Mars. Allan Hills 84001 formed more than 4Gyr ago, and owing to its age and long exposure to the Martian environment, and this meteorite has features that may record early processes. These features include a highly fractured texture, gases trapped during one or more impact events or during formation of the rock, and spherical Fe-Mg-Ca carbonates. In this study, we have concentrated on providing new insights into the context of these carbonates using a range of techniques to explore whether they record multiple precipitation and shock events. The petrographic features and compositional properties of these carbonates indicate that at least two pulses of Mg- and Fe-rich solutions saturated the rock. Those two generations of carbonates can be distinguished by a very sharp change in compositions, from being rich in Mg and poor in Fe and Mn, to being poor in Mg and rich in Fe and Mn. Between these two generations of carbonate is evidence for fracturing and local corrosion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.1
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available