4.4 Article

Non-invasive urinary metabolomic profiling discriminates prostate cancer from benign prostatic hyperplasia

Journal

METABOLOMICS
Volume 13, Issue 5, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s11306-017-1194-y

Keywords

Biomarkers; Metabolomics; Prostate cancer; Benign prostatic hyperplasia; Nuclear magnetic resonance

Funding

  1. Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad [SAF2014-53977-R]
  2. Conselleria de Educacion, Investigacion, Cultura y Deporte (GVA) [PROMETEO/2016/103]
  3. Abbott from the Spanish Society of Urology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction Prostate cancer (PCa) is one of the most common malignancies in men worldwide. Serum prostate specific antigen (PSA) level has been extensively used as a biomarker to detect PCa. However, PSA is not cancerspecific and various non-malignant conditions, including benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH), can cause a rise in PSA blood levels, thus leading to many false positive results. Objectives In this study, we evaluated the potential of urinary metabolomic profiling for discriminating PCa from BPH. Methods Urine samples from 64 PCa patients and 51 individuals diagnosed with BPH were analysed using 1H nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR). Comparative analysis of urinary metabolomic profiles was carried out using multivariate and univariate statistical approaches. Results The urine metabolomic profile of PCa patients is characterised by increased concentrations of branchedchain amino acids (BCAA), glutamate and pseudouridine, and decreased concentrations of glycine, dimethylglycine, fumarate and 4-imidazole-acetate compared with individuals diagnosed with BPH. Conclusion PCa patients have a specific urinary metabolomic profile. The results of our study underscore the clinical potential of metabolomic profiling to uncover metabolic changes that could be useful to discriminate PCa from BPH in a clinical context.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available