4.7 Article

ATP-free biosynthesis of a high-energy phosphate metabolite fructose 1,6-diphosphate by in vitro metabolic engineering

Journal

METABOLIC ENGINEERING
Volume 42, Issue -, Pages 168-174

Publisher

ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1016/j.ymben.2017.06.006

Keywords

Fructose 1,6-diphosphate; In vitro metabolic engineering; Sugar phosphate; Hyperthermophilic enzyme; Enzyme cocktail

Funding

  1. Open Funding Project of the State Key Laboratory of Bioreactor Engineering
  2. Shanghai Committee of Science and Technology [13DZ1930202]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Fructose 1,6-diphosphate (FDP) is a widely used medicine and is also a precursor of two important three-carbon phosphates - glyceraldehyde 3-phosphate (GA3P) and dihydroxyacetone phosphate (DHAP) for the biosynthesis of numerous fine chemicals. An in vitro synthetic cofactor-free enzymatic pathway comprised of four hyperthermophilic enzymes was designed to produce FDP from starch and pyrophosphate. All of four hyperthermophilic enzymes (i.e., alpha-glucan phosphorylase from Thermotaga maritima, phosphoglucomutase from Thermococcus kodakarensis, glucose 6-phosphate isomerase from Thermus thermophilus, and pyrophosphate phosphofructokinase from T. maritima) were overexpressed in E. coli BL21(DE3) and purified by simple heat precipitation. The optimal pH and temperature of one-pot biosynthesis were 7.2 and 70 degrees C, respectively. The optimal enzyme ratios of alpha GP, PGM, PGI and PFK were 2:2:1:2 in terms of units. Via step-wise addition of new substrates, up to 125 +/- 4.6 mM FDP was synthesized after 7-h reaction. This de novo ATP-free enzymatic pathway comprised of all hyperthermophilic enzymes could drastically decrease the manufacturing costs of FDP and its derivatives GA3P and DHAP, better than those catalyzed by ATP-regeneration cascade biocatalysis, the use of mesophilic enzymes, whole cell lysates, and microbial cell factories.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available