Strengths and Gaps in Physicians’ Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication
Published 2017 View Full Article
- Home
- Publications
- Publication Search
- Publication Details
Title
Strengths and Gaps in Physicians’ Risk Communication: A Scenario Study of the Influence of Numeracy on Cancer Screening Communication
Authors
Keywords
-
Journal
MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 355-365
Publisher
SAGE Publications
Online
2017-09-08
DOI
10.1177/0272989x17729359
References
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Related references
Note: Only part of the references are listed.- Physicians’ Perceptions of Patients’ Knowledge and Opinions Regarding Breast Cancer: Associations with Patient Education and Physician Numeracy
- (2017) Britta L. Anderson et al. Breast Care
- Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review
- (2016) Tanner J. Caverly et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Improving risk literacy in surgeons
- (2016) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Presentation of Benefits and Harms in US Cancer Screening and Prevention Guidelines: Systematic Review
- (2016) Tanner J. Caverly et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- Is Patients’ Numeracy Related to Physical and Mental Health?
- (2015) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Clinicians’ Perceptions of the Benefits and Harms of Prostate and Colorectal Cancer Screening
- (2015) Emily A. Elstad et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Understanding the Harms and Benefits of Cancer Screening
- (2015) Dafina Petrova et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Enthusiasm for cancer screening in Great Britain: a general population survey
- (2014) J Waller et al. BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER
- Shared decision making in patients at risk of cancer: the role of domain and numeracy
- (2014) Yaniv Hanoch et al. HEALTH EXPECTATIONS
- Factors predicting surgeons’ preferred and actual roles in interactions with their patients.
- (2014) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Confusing Relative Risk with Absolute Risk Is Associated with More Enthusiastic Beliefs about the Value of Cancer Screening
- (2014) Tanner J. Caverly et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Breast cancer screening pamphlets mislead women
- (2014) G. Gigerenzer BMJ-British Medical Journal
- National Evidence on the Use of Shared Decision Making in Prostate-Specific Antigen Screening
- (2013) P. K. J. Han et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- Screening for Prostate Cancer: U.S. Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement
- (2013) Virginia A. Moyer ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Do Physicians Understand Cancer Screening Statistics? A National Survey of Primary Care Physicians in the United States
- (2013) Odette Wegwarth ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE
- Presenting quantitative information about decision outcomes: a risk communication primer for patient decision aid developers
- (2013) Lyndal J Trevena et al. BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
- Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment in Cancer
- (2013) Laura J. Esserman et al. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
- How Do Physicians Provide Statistical Information about Antidepressants to Hypothetical Patients?
- (2013) Wolfgang Gaissmaier et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Visual representation of statistical information improves diagnostic inferences in doctors and their patients
- (2013) Rocio Garcia-Retamero et al. SOCIAL SCIENCE & MEDICINE
- Women's views on overdiagnosis in breast cancer screening: a qualitative study
- (2013) J. Hersch et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Overdiagnosis and Overtreatment
- (2013) Odette Wegwarth et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- The Harms of Screening
- (2013) Russell P. Harris et al. JAMA Internal Medicine
- Patients' Expectations of Screening and Preventive Treatments
- (2012) B. Hudson et al. ANNALS OF FAMILY MEDICINE
- The Right Tool Is What They Need, Not What We Have
- (2012) Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher MEDICAL CARE RESEARCH AND REVIEW
- Cancer Screening Campaigns — Getting Past Uninformative Persuasion
- (2012) Steven Woloshin et al. NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE
- How a charity oversells mammography
- (2012) S. Woloshin et al. BMJ-British Medical Journal
- Statistical Literacy in Obstetricians and Gynecologists
- (2012) Britta L. Anderson et al. Journal for Healthcare Quality
- Physiciansʼ communication of Down syndrome screening test results: The influence of physician numeracy
- (2011) Britta L. Anderson et al. GENETICS IN MEDICINE
- Do low-numeracy people avoid shared decision making?
- (2011) Mirta Galesic et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Numbers can be worth a thousand pictures: Individual differences in understanding graphical and numerical representations of health-related information.
- (2011) Wolfgang Gaissmaier et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Choice, numeracy, and physicians-in-training performance: The case of Medicare Part D.
- (2010) Yaniv Hanoch et al. HEALTH PSYCHOLOGY
- Breast Cancer Patients’ Treatment Expectations after Exposure to the Decision Aid Program Adjuvant Online: The Influence of Numeracy
- (2010) Isaac M. Lipkus et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- Decision-Making Processes for Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Screening: The DECISIONS Survey
- (2010) Richard M. Hoffman et al. MEDICAL DECISION MAKING
- “There is nothing to worry about”: Gynecologists’ counseling on mammography
- (2010) Odette Wegwarth et al. PATIENT EDUCATION AND COUNSELING
- Public Knowledge of Benefits of Breast and Prostate Cancer Screening in Europe
- (2009) G. Gigerenzer et al. JNCI-Journal of the National Cancer Institute
- How numeracy influences risk comprehension and medical decision making.
- (2009) Valerie F. Reyna et al. PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN
- Improving understanding of adjuvant therapy options by using simpler risk graphics
- (2008) Brian J. Zikmund-Fisher et al. CANCER
Find Funding. Review Successful Grants.
Explore over 25,000 new funding opportunities and over 6,000,000 successful grants.
ExploreBecome a Peeref-certified reviewer
The Peeref Institute provides free reviewer training that teaches the core competencies of the academic peer review process.
Get Started